Back to Blog

Anxiety Is My Co-Pilot

June 5, 2025

Robin Oliverio, Ph.D., Kamin Science Center

Perspective, Please

You’ve probably heard that you are more likely to die in a car crash than in a plane crash opens in a new window. Technically, that’s true.

But is flying actually safer? The answer is: it depends.

Not all flights are created equal – just as not all vehicles carry the same level of risk. Riding a motorcycle, for example, is far more dangerous opens in a new window than driving a car. Similarly, commercial flights (scheduled flights on large planes) are much safer than general aviation opens in a new window (non-commercial, non-military flights).

Comparing driving and flying is tricky because driving is often a daily necessity, while flying is something most people do only occasionally opens in a new window. That’s why researchers sometimes compare fatalities per hour spent traveling.

By that measure, commercial flights are 1.4 times opens in a new window less likely to result in death than driving a car. In contrast, general aviation (e.g., personal flights) is about 14 times opens in a new window more deadly than driving a car. And while that sounds like a lot, it’s still only half as deadly opens in a new window as riding a motorcycle.

So yes, the level of risk depends on how and what you’re flying (or driving). But overall, your odds are still pretty favorable for a safe flying experience.

Is 2025 Off to a Bad Start?

If that hasn’t calmed your nerves, here’s something that might help: air travel continues to get safer.

To date in 2025, there have been 336 aviation accidents opens in a new window in the United States. Of these accidents, 188 resulted in no injuries, while 51 were fatal (resulted in at least one death).

That’s actually a slight improvement over this point in 2024, when there were 424 aviation accidents opens in a new window, 241 of which did not result in any injury and 54 were fatal opens in a new window.

The difference between the past two years? The January 2025 crash claimed 67 lives opens in a new window – making it the deadliest aviation incident since 9/11 opens in a new window.

Preliminary NTSB reports opens in a new window suggest the crash may have been caused by a combination of miscommunication, faulty altitude readings, and limited visibility – complicated further by the helicopter crew’s use of night-vision goggles.

Most aviation accidents boil down to two main causes: human error and mechanical failure opens in a new window. So how do we reduce these risks? Regulation plays a big role. Stronger oversight, more rigorous inspections, and strict adherence to safety protocols opens in a new window can help prevent mechanical issues. Meanwhile, better training and preparation can reduce the likelihood of human mistakes.

Flying will never be completely risk-free. But thanks to continuous improvements in engineering, regulation, and training, it’s safer now than it’s ever been.

As the countdown begins for my cross-country flight, anxiety may be my co-pilot – but I’ll also be flying with the reassurance of strong safety records, cutting-edge technology, and good old-fashioned regulation.

And if that’s not enough? Statistics, snacks, and noise-canceling headphones should help me get through.

About Robin Oliverio, Ph.D.

Robin holds a Ph.D. in neuroscience and is passionate about bridging the gap between science and policy. She focuses on using research to inform evidence-based policies that drive positive societal change. She is strongly committed to projects that make a meaningful difference in people’s lives, and she thrives in roles where science meets advocacy, communication, and impact.

If you have any questions or would like a particular topic to be featured, please reach out to Dr. Oliverio, science communications & media specialist, at OliverioR@CarnegieScienceCenter.org

x
Open 10 a.m.–5 p.m. | Closed Tuesdays.
Close at 4 p.m. on Mon., Jan. 12.
USS Requin is closed for annual winter maintenance.